- From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 12:17:48 -0700
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>, W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com> wrote: > Andrey Mikhalev wrote: > > > > in 6.6.7: > > "The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation > > taking a simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class > > itself and pseudo-elements) as an argument." > > > > so, :not(:pseudo-element) - allowed by formal grammar - > > is invalid selector or "useless" selector, as foo:not(bar) ? > > Excerpt from section 6.6.7: > > The negation pseudo-class, :not(X), is a functional notation > taking a simple selector (excluding the negation pseudo-class itself > and pseudo-elements) as an argument. Andrey quoted exactly the same text in his original message. I assume you mean to imply that the answer to his question *should be* obvious from that text, but since he quoted it before asking the question, it is not obvious to him, so your answer is not helpful. zw
Received on Thursday, 12 March 2009 19:18:39 UTC