- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:19:29 +0100
- To: www-style@w3.org, www-svg@w3.org
2009/2/27 Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>: > Cameron McCormack: >> The model used for specifying transitions, i.e. that the >> transition-property, transition-duration, etc. properties each take a >> sequence of values, seems to prevent an author from specifying >> independent transitions. For example, an author may want to specify: > … >> where the set of elements matched by .canmove and .canhide are >> different. If more than one element matches both selectors, however, >> the properties from the .canhide rules will override the ones from >> .canmove. > > Make that “If an element matches both selectors, however …”. > > -- > Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/ > > Transition is not the first property to have that problem (font-family, background-image, binding, content...) and I recently proposed the "cascade" keyword that inserts value from the cascade process in the specified value. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Feb/0550.html and following. Giovanni
Received on Friday, 27 February 2009 14:20:05 UTC