- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:14:25 +0100
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Cc: "Robert O'Callahan" <robert@ocallahan.org>, "www-style@w3.org WG" <www-style@w3.org>
David Hyatt wrote:
> >>> See http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-multicol/#column4. The spec says
> >>> nothing about the z-order of column-rules relative to other
> >>> rendered items. It needs to, in terms of
> >>> http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/zindex.html.
> >>>
> >>> For a columns element that is also a stacking context, Webkit
> >>> apparently paints them in step 4 or later, e.g. above
> >>> negative-zindex children of the columns element. My preference
> >>> is for the rules to be painted as part of the background of the
> >>> columns element, just above the actual background --- i.e., for
> >>> a columns element that is also a stacking context, at the end
> >>> of step 2. This seems a bit more logical to me. Anyway, the
> >>> spec needs clarification one way or another.
> >>
> >> Could you propose some text to this effect?
> > I agree with Roc's suggestion. We can make that change in WebKit.
>
> Fixed to match what Roc suggested.
Super, it's good to see implementations converge like this.
I've added this text to the draft:
Column rules are painted just above the background of the multicol
element. This allows child elements with 'z-index' values to be on
top of column rules.
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-multicol/#column-gaps-and-rules
-h&kon
Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª
howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 23 February 2009 21:15:16 UTC