- From: L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 13:21:16 -0800
- To: CSS WG <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 2009-02-20 13:16 -0800, L. David Baron wrote: > * require that you can't specify background-size in the shorthand > without also specifying background-position (so that you can't > use the '/' separating background-position and background size > and simultaneously omit background-position) To be clear, this would probably be my preference. It would also require that we not reintroduce the ability to say "background-color: / red" as a synonym for "background-color: transparent / red", at least in the shorthand (although I'd sort of prefer forbidding it in the longhand too; I don't it's particularly readable). -David -- L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ Mozilla Corporation http://www.mozilla.com/
Received on Friday, 20 February 2009 21:21:52 UTC