- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:54:15 +0100
- To: Richard Ishida <ishida@w3.org>
- Cc: 'fantasai' <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, www-style@w3.org, www-international@w3.org
[resent, it apparently never hit www-style yesterday] As I already told the CSS WG, an expert told me tonight that numbered lists using the traditional armenian numbering are very rare. She sent me a few minutes ago a mail telling me that even in liturgic documents, numbering is done using arabic numbers and almost never using armenian numbers, even in old sources. Attached is a copy of the Gospel of Saint John. So the question about 'armenian' mapping to 'lower-armenian' or 'upper-armenian' is probably not a hot issue: these values will remain underused anyway. http://disruptive-innovations.com/zoo/csswg/ArmenianExample.jpg </Daniel>
Received on Thursday, 12 February 2009 07:54:54 UTC