- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 10:19:53 +0100
- To: "Ambrose Li" <ambrose.li@gmail.com>, "Henri Sivonen" <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- Cc: "Robert J Burns" <rob@robburns.com>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, "W3C Style List" <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:12:55 +0100, Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com> wrote: > Pardon my ignorance too, but this is complete news to me. As far as I > can tell the discussion was not "revolved around" input methods at > all. IME was part of the discussion, but in no way was the focus. As far as I can tell Henri is right. The reason the i18n WG wants this solved on the user agent side is because the authoring side is inconsistent in chosing a particular Unicode Normalization Form. -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Wednesday, 11 February 2009 09:21:06 UTC