- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2009 12:57:00 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- CC: benjo316@gmail.com, "www-style@w3.org List" <www-style@w3.org>, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk
> <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote:
>
>> I think you've missed the point.
>>
>> position:relative is moving the element onto completely different stack
>> order.
>>
>> All position:relative elements will move it on *top* of canvas layer. No
>> matter what value of z-index it has.
>> Thus you cannot move positioned element underneath its static neighbors by
>> using z-index.
>>
>
> You may want to try some examples yourself, because this is incorrect.
> Giving an element position:relative, and nothing else, will indeed
> put it above its static neighbors by default. However, a negative
> z-index on it will push it underneath its static neighbors. There is
> interop on this.
>
>
>> But style="margin: -10px 0" when applied to static element moves its top
>> side over its siblings [on canvas] and its bottom
>> underneath its siblings [that are on the canvas layer]. A bit strange
>> structure of space/time continuum if to speak about intuition.
>>
>
> This makes complete sense. Elements later in the document order are
> later in the paint order as well.
>
Try this:
<html>
<head>
<style>
.layer div { width:100px; height:100px; }
.layer div.principal { margin:-10px 0; width:110px; }
.layer div:hover { background:gold !important; }
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="layer">
<div class="static" style="background:red">Red</div>
<div class="principal" style="opacity:0.5; background:blue">Blue</div>
<div class="static" style="background:green">Green</div>
</div>
<hr/>
<div class="layer">
<div class="static" style="background:red">Red</div>
<div class="principal" style="background:blue">Blue</div>
<div class="static" style="background:green">Green</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Which rendering on these two div.layer's is more intuitive?
--
Andrew Fedoniouk.
http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 20:57:46 UTC