- From: Ambrose Li <ambrose.li@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:25:51 -0500
- To: Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>
- Cc: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Andrew Cunningham <andrewc@vicnet.net.au>, public-i18n-core@w3.org, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
2009/2/4 Jonathan Kew <jonathan@jfkew.plus.com>: > The choice of case-sensitivity vs case-insensitivity is not really > comparable. It's true that most current programming and markup languages are > case sensitive, I think, although this is not universal. (What does the HTML > spec say? The UAs I'm accustomed to seem to treat it as case-insensitive.) HTML is not based on XML and it is case insensitive. If an UA treats HTML as case sensitive then that UA is buggy. -- cheers, -ambrose The 'net used to be run by smart people; now many sites are run by idiots. So SAD... (Sites that do spam filtering on mails sent to the abuse contact need to be cut off the net...)
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2009 03:26:29 UTC