- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 14:13:03 -0800
- To: Robert J Burns <rob@robburns.com>
- CC: public-i18n-core@w3.org, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>
Robert J Burns wrote: > > However Unicode has a SHOULD requirement that two canonically equivalent > but codepoint differing strings match. Unicode's Chapter 3 (C6 norm) says: > >> A process shall not assume that the interpretations of two >> canonical-equivalent character sequences are distinct. That's a MUST requirement. SHALL == MUST, see RFC2119. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 22:13:49 UTC