W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > December 2009

Re: [css3-transitions] faster reversing of partially completed ?transitions

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2009 13:31:56 -0600
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0912281131u77c0f357ia9e8e21e05f38d19@mail.gmail.com>
To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 12:43 PM, L. David Baron <dbaron@dbaron.org> wrote:
>> (2) jump to the point in the timing function (at the specified
>>     transition-duration) for the reverse transition that would have
>>     the element at its current position (and thus ignore
>>     transition-delay entirely)
> I tried implementing this, and it also looked horrible (due to
> unexpected jumpiness).

I'm curious about this.  Can you describe the jumpiness?  It doesn't
seem like anything should jump at all; is it that perhaps the element
changes velocity (not counting the reversal itself) in a possibly
discontinuous manner?  That is, with a transition that is ease-in both
ways, if you reversed it near the beginning of the transition it would
change from transitioning quickly (the start of an ease-in transition)
to transitioning slowly in reverse (the end of an ease-in transition).

Received on Monday, 28 December 2009 19:32:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:41 UTC