- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:51:46 -0800
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:33 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Dec 18, 2009, at 5:09 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Brad Kemper >> <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:18 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." >>> <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> It's possible that this can have its definition generalized >>>> somewhat >>>> so it makes sense outside of this specific use-case. >>> >>> Maybe "Presentation Levels" could be wrangled into doing that? Or >>> is that >>> spec actually "specifiction" (my new favorite word)? >> >> Hmm, I'm not seeing an immediate connection here. What were you >> thinking of? > > Well, I think I am misunderstanding how Presentation Levels work. > When I first read it, I was thinking that they could group elements > by defining their level, and then select that group to style as a > unit (ie, with an anonymous box around contiguous elements of the > same level), but now I think that I totally read too much into it. > So... Sorry for the noise. The thing that made me think of this was that I was thinking "what else besides definition list might have a logical relationship, but not necessarily an existing element encapsulating them?" and I immediately thought of a heading level and the paragraphs that followed it before another heading was encountered. And that made me think of Presentation Levels.
Received on Saturday, 19 December 2009 01:53:30 UTC