Re: Request for ::di pseudoelement

On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 6:33 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2009, at 3:18 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
>> It's possible that this can have its definition generalized somewhat
>> so it makes sense outside of this specific use-case.
>
> Maybe "Presentation Levels" could be wrangled into doing that? Or is that
> spec actually "specifiction" (my new favorite word)?

Hmm, I'm not seeing an immediate connection here.  What were you thinking of?

~TJ