- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 17:55:13 +0100
- To: Masataka Yakura <myakura.web@gmail.com>
- Cc: "Ph. Wittenbergh" <jk7r-obt@asahi-net.or.jp>, www-style List <www-style@w3.org>
On Friday 18 December 2009, Masataka Yakura wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 12:50 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > > On Wednesday 16 December 2009, Ph. Wittenbergh wrote: > >> On Dec 16, 2009, at 8:30 AM, Bert Bos wrote: > >> > The specification is here: > >> > > >> > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/PR-css3-selectors-20091215/ > >> > >> under 1.2 > >> > >> [quote] > >> 'Additional terminology is defined in the Definitions section of > >> [CSS21]. Examples of document source code and fragments are given > >> in XML [[XML10] or HTML [[HTML40]] syntax. ' [/quote] > >> > >> I think shouldn't [XML10] and [HTML40] be linkified ? > > > > Yes, it's my fault: The links were broken in the editor's draft and > > my attempt to fix them just before publication clearly failed. :-( > > > > I've updated the editor's draft. It doesn't seem urgent to > > republish the PR. > > There's "[HTML401]" in the references section so we now have two > separate refs to HTML4. The text above looks it doesn't need to > specifically refer to HTML 4.0, so it should point to 4.01 instead. > > I also found some references point to old documents: > > - [XML-NAMES] is now a REC. > - [BCP47] got an update so that it is no longer "currently > represented by RFC 3066". > > Anyway, congratulations :) All three updated in the draft of the next version. Thanks! Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 18 December 2009 16:55:49 UTC