On Aug 30, 2009, at 7:40 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> Note, though, that doing so *still* isn't backwards-compatible. A >> legacy browser would see the normal url(), ignore the >> background-image-region property. > > I was thinking of that as a feature, not a problem, but maybe not. What I mean, for instance is that I could use multiple backgrounds or a 'sliding doors' technique for a base button for compatibility. Then use the fragment notation, without respecifying the file name, to access the parts of the image that are clipped. But in further thinking, I suppose this is still not much better than using background-position, and doesn't help much with using sprites with border-image. Oh well, it was a thought, and maybe it will trigger a better idea from someone else.Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 04:42:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:39 UTC