- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2009 18:52:01 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Brad Kemper wrote: > But since the URL of the stylesheet is not an especially useful thing to > hang a hash value (or whatever that's actually called) on, I was > thinking it would be more like the path and filename would form > something like a "base URL" for a property, once it was assigned to that > property to indicate an image file. If CSS declared this to be the case, > would it really be a problem for the RFCs or any existing style sheets? Put that way no to the first and probably not to the second (though you never know when someone got clever with content negotiation), but it sounds like you're suggesting using some intermediate cascaded value (not the specified value, not the computed value, something entirely different) to assign the base url? That seems like it would cause problems for CSS itself, in terms of violating the existing CSS processing model (where for example adding a new rule that overrides all others and sets the value of a property to what its computed value is without that rule doesn't change anything; with your setup it sounds like it might). -Boris
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 01:52:46 UTC