W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Gradient syntax proposal

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 14:38:24 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908261238r4d7cf125gf95e63ae4f7a8197@mail.gmail.com>
To: CRJaquez@gmail.com
Cc: David Perrell <davidp@hpaa.com>, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Christopher Robert
Jaquez<crjaquez@gmail.com> wrote:
>> | From: Tab Atkins Jr.
>> | All right, so a vote for each.  Anyone else?
> I like vertical better as the default.  It seems more language neutral in a
> ltr/rtl sense.  The left side seems the "obvious" or "natural" place to
> start anything for a ltr language speaker/writer but not so much for the
> rest of the world.  On the other hand, top-down seems more universal (at
> least to me ;-).

All right, so three votes for vertical, and my vote was only slightly
in favor of horizontal based on my own authoring experience (I use
gradients a lot to make top-level headers visually pop in a long
list).  Vertical it is.

Edits have been made to the master proposal, located at
http://www.xanthir.com/:4bhipd.  I also added a line with the syntax
to the first example.

I'm not happy with how I phrased the comma thing, or with the fact
that I had to say it at all.  I think it's confusing.  I suspect that
it would be better to handle that in the grammar, but I'm not sure of
how to write it.  Ideas?

Received on Wednesday, 26 August 2009 19:39:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:38 UTC