- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2009 11:01:42 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Zack Weinberg wrote: > fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > ... >>> There are three possible cases of the area where gradient >>> transition may happen. They are presented on this figure: >>> >>> http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/border-radius-transition-areas-fig.png > ... >> The intention of the spec is to limit transitions to area B. >> This is because the conjunction of different styles may need >> the full area of B. > > Well, I believe you, but I could really use an example. I cannot think > of a circumstance where you would need the additional area provided by > B, even for border-style transitions. Also (as I said previously) the > text doesn't sound like it specifies B to me. > > I see you changed the wording and picked up my diagram, but my diagram > is illustrating C, and the wording is now even more confusing to me :-( Okay, I guess I need to work on the wording some more then. :) >> If you're just joining two solid borders >> and want to do a color transition, you wouldn't want to use >> the full area of B, you'd want to draw lines through the border >> from the ends of the inner curve to the ends of the outer curve. >> In the case where the inner curve is a sharp corner, you draw >> angled lines through the border from the point to the ends of >> the curve on the outer edge. > > The possibility of the transition boundary lines being angled never > occurred to me. I've updated my diagram again (attached, SVG and PNG > both). Is this what you had in mind for color transitions? Yes, that's exactly what I had in mind! ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 24 August 2009 18:02:41 UTC