W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSS3, Backgrounds and Borders Module] some questions about border-radius

From: Zack Weinberg <zweinberg@mozilla.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 21:40:06 -0700
To: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, W3C Emailing list for WWW Style <www-style@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20090822214006.7a3c9265@trurl>
Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com> wrote:
> "The transition must be contained within the segment of the border
> where the tangent of the inner curve either not defined or is not
> parallel with the sides of the box."
> It is not clear what does "tangent of the inner curve not defined"
> mean exactly. Is it an attempt to define case #9 here? :
> http://www.terrainformatica.com/w3/round-corners-sciter.png
> (case: width of borders is larger than border radius)

That's how I read it.  The tangent is undefined at a sharp corner.
Thus, in your case #9, the gradients can extend to the points where the
outer and inner edges become parallel lines again.

Perhaps that's better wording?  Something like

  The transition must remain entirely within the areas of the border
  where the inner and outer edges are not parallel straight lines.

A diagram would be really helpful, perhaps something like this: 

> I believe that the only reasonable type of gradient here is so called 
> conic gradient. Probably it makes sense to define just that?

I'd call that out of scope for Level 3.  There are several shipping
implementations that do sharp transitions.

Received on Sunday, 23 August 2009 04:41:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:39 UTC