- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:14:02 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "David Perrell" <davidp@hpaa.com>
- Cc: <www-style@w3.org>
From: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:11 PM, David Perrell<davidp@hpaa.com> wrote: >> Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> | (Interestingly, the syntax would then look like just "<bg-position> || >> | <angle>".) >> >> Lookin' gooood! > > I've gone ahead and updated the draft to match this: > > http://www.xanthir.com/:4bhipd Good proposal. ------------------------------------- Only one question though. Gradients are images that does not have any predefined size. Is it really usefull to allow <length> to be used (that mean we could use units like "px" or "em") ? If yes, what to do if the background where the gradient must take place is 50px * 50px and the start point of the background is, let's say, at (60px: 0px). Is that valid but 'outside' the visible zone of the image ? Is this invalid ? -------------------------------------- [...] For example, the rule linear-gradient(left / red, yellow 100px, blue 50%) would [...] > The amount of text ended up about the same, because I added several > (hopefully) clarifying examples in that section. > > I've also updated all the examples on the page appropriately. Ping me > if there's an inconsistency somewhere. > > ~TJ >
Received on Saturday, 22 August 2009 12:14:41 UTC