- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:50:57 -0500
- To: David Perrell <davidp@hpaa.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:15 PM, David Perrell<davidp@hpaa.com> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > | Given your clarifications above, I find that I'm wrong. You'd need to > | combine this with background-size to get it to work as I want with > | gradients. > > Not "wrong." Half of an image getting overlaid with a flipped copy of the other half has the advantage of not conflicting with background-repeat. So the constructed image could then be tiled. I meant that, to make gradients work with background-mirror in the way that I want, I'd have to combine with background-size and such. As you've written, background-mirror does *not* overwrite any part of an image; it's just a unique way to tile an image. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 19:51:56 UTC