- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 17:56:23 -0500
- To: David Perrell <davidp@hpaa.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 5:52 PM, David Perrell<davidp@hpaa.com> wrote: > Brad Kemper wrote: > | You mean because having the bg-positions to start and stop on is > | essentially creating a new box with it's own internal dimensions of > | 0%-100% and 0px or more? You thinking you can just create a second > | background thats as small as that box? I was think of that too, but > | the gradation actually needs to keep going on all four sides of that > | box, even at odd angles, so I don't think that'd work. > > Well, could no-repeat stop it from going on all four sides? > > Oh, wait, semantically, that makes no sense... > > Except that it's an IMAGE, not a color, right? Sized background images with > no-repeat don't go out on all four sides. Indeed, if you're sizing it. Normally a gradient auto-sizes to the size of the box, though, so you don't have any problem with this. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 15 August 2009 22:57:18 UTC