- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:19:58 -0500
- To: James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:15 PM, James Elmore<James.Elmore@cox.net> wrote: > Hi, all; > > Why not place the gradient FIRST, then the positioning? [snip] Interesting... I might like this. What do others think? > I am losing parts of this discussion, either because I do not yet have my > head around the concepts, or because I do not have a reference for the > actual proposal. Rather than repeat everything, could someone provide a url > to the syntax being proposed. At least, a reference to the 'bg-position' > would help me. Maybe I am just too lazy to look it up, but it is not clear > to me exactly what the difficulties / complexities of the positioning system > are. Ah, sorry, it was in the first email to the thread. http://www.xanthir.com/document/document.php?id=d65df9d10442ef96c2dfe5e1d7bbebf7aa42f2bcf24e68fc3777c4b484fa8a4ce55fed2189cac20ccad8686127f4c08917c4ca8b7614e9f89c2a950ec083a9c6 <bg-position> refers to the syntax used in the background-position property. ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 15 August 2009 19:20:59 UTC