W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: Gradient syntax proposal

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:19:58 -0500
Message-ID: <dd0fbad0908151219j14f53684p561bb3b97cd4777c@mail.gmail.com>
To: James Elmore <James.Elmore@cox.net>
Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 2:15 PM, James Elmore<James.Elmore@cox.net> wrote:
> Hi, all;
> Why not place the gradient FIRST, then the positioning?

Interesting...  I might like this.  What do others think?

> I am losing parts of this discussion, either because I do not yet have my
> head around the concepts, or because I do not have a reference for the
> actual proposal. Rather than repeat everything, could someone provide a url
> to the syntax being proposed. At least, a reference to the 'bg-position'
> would help me. Maybe I am just too lazy to look it up, but it is not clear
> to me exactly what the difficulties / complexities of the positioning system
> are.

Ah, sorry, it was in the first email to the thread.


<bg-position> refers to the syntax used in the background-position property.

Received on Saturday, 15 August 2009 19:20:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:38 UTC