- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:47:33 -0500
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:16 PM, Tab Atkins Jr.<jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, but allowing the literate form (in addition to the short "left" > form) makes a *wonderful* parallel to the full <bg-position> > construction, so it's easy to learn and understand. This suggestion > from Elika was a definite win in my mind. After some thought, I think I'd rather make that parallel explicit. I want to change the second construction back to only taking a single keyword, but then add those keywords to the possible values in the second construction, and define what they translate to in terms of <bg-position>. "left", frex, would translate to "left center" as a <bg-position>. The syntax would then look like: [ <angle> [ inside | outside ]? | <point> | [ <bg-position> | <point> ] to [ <bg-position> | <point> ] ] with <point> being [ left | right | top | bottom | top-left | top-right | bottom-left | bottom-right ]. Sound good? ~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 22:48:33 UTC