- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 17:26:03 -0500
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Brad Kemper<brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Aug 14, 2009, at 2:35 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Brad Kemper<brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On Aug 14, 2009, at 1:44 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> How about a new property, border-overlay, that just stretches a border to >>> >>> the border box, and shows the part that intersects with the border. Done, >>> >>> end of definition. ;) >>> >>> Or 'border-background' that does everything that background does (except >>> >>> background-clip), but just within the border? >>> >>> You can do that currently by specifying multiple backgrounds, with the >>> first set to border-box and the second set to padding-box. >>> >>> Good point. The fallback isn't as nice, but probably good enough. >> >> Remember, you can always specify your single background first, then >> put the multiple backgrounds later. Old UA's'll just discard the >> latter. > > I know. I meant a border fallback. Oh, gotcha. Yeah, that's not quite as good. ~TJ
Received on Friday, 14 August 2009 22:26:57 UTC