- From: Christopher Robert Jaquez <crjaquez@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:21:39 -0400
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan<robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> >> wrote: >>> >>> Oops, I should have read that before posting. Yes, if we can disambiguate >>> points, colors and angles then this is very good... >> >> >> Except that radial-gradient(white 1px 2px 3px, blue 4px 5px 6px) is pretty >> confusing... > > What if we required the order to be <point> <color> for linear gradients and > <point> <color> <length> for radial gradients? I think that would be better. > I like that. And for a linear gradient, the end value could optionally be <angle> <color> <length> > Rob > -- > "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; > the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are > healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his > own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah > 53:5-6] >
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 22:22:36 UTC