W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > August 2009

Re: [CSSWG] Minutes and Resolutions 2009-08-12

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:47:46 +1200
Message-ID: <11e306600908131447i2a735420w1f3028c4b02179f1@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 9:25 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote:

> But my point is that this is being discussed in term of using gradient as
> an image type, so it would be weird and redundant to have a bunch of
> background properties inside it, and then use it instead of URL() inside of
> an element's own background properties.

It doesn't have a bunch of background properties inside it. We reuse
background position syntax, that's all.

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Thursday, 13 August 2009 21:48:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:38 UTC