- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:14:28 -0500
- To: Alexis Deveria <adeveria@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 7:53 AM, Alexis Deveria <adeveria@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! Yeah, the multiple element support was a little tricky to deal > with. Since I didn't want to modify the DOM structure, the script > doesn't create a parent container for multiple elements. Thus, the > slot isn't stretched when it actually should be. I'm sure the current > behavior can be improved upon though, so thanks for mentioning that. Ah, k. I brought it up, actually, because my reading of the spec suggests that the stretching should *not* occur. An example or two implies it in the suggested rendering, but it doesn't seem to be expressed anywhere in the actual rules. I believe they should act in every way like ordinary elements placed into an invisible container. Bert would probably know a bit better about it than I, though. ^_^ ~TJ
Received on Saturday, 25 April 2009 04:15:08 UTC