Simon Pieters wrote: > On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:29 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > >> Erik Dahlström wrote: >>>>> Previously, the CSS spec had the same keywords as SVG. What's >>>>> the reason for the change? > ... >> Actually, the original name in the CSS draft was copied from SMIL >> and was 'fit', not 'preserveAspectRatio'. > > But the *keywords* were fill | hidden | meet | slice, > where meet and slice are the same as in SVG. I was replying to the minutes, specifically "ED: image-fit ... according to simon, they called it pAR first, not sure what's the reason for changing it" HP has gotten very positive feedback on the keyword name change, btw. I don't think we want to revert that. ~fantasaiReceived on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 16:27:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:35 UTC