- From: James Hopkins <james@idreamincode.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:19:33 +0100
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: Thomas Phinney <tphinney@cal.berkeley.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 21 Apr 2009, at 22:43, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 5:35 PM, James Hopkins <james@idreamincode.co.uk > > wrote: >> Based on your feedback, my conclusion is that 4.1.3 is in this >> respect is >> unclear. The current spec states "... [identifiers] can contain >> only the >> characters [a-z0-9] and ISO 10646 characters U+00A1 and higher, >> plus the >> hyphen (-) and the underscore (_); they cannot start with a digit, >> or a >> hyphen followed by a digit. Identifiers can also contain escaped >> characters >> and any ISO 10646 character as a numeric code ..." If indeed the >> Number Sign >> is lower than U+00A1 then how can it be acceptable within in an >> identifier, >> without being escaped? > > Why do you think that # is acceptable in identifiers without being > escaped? First of all, apologies. I was restricting my train of thought to the use of CSS specifically with HTML, where 'id="invalid identifier" would be invalid. Although I haven't had any experience with applying CSS to XML, I guess a 'multi-id' selector incorporating the # notation would match such an attribute value where multiple tokens are legal. > It would be syntactically ambiguous: does .foo#bar mean an > element with class "foo#bar", or an element with class "foo" and id > "bar"? It's the latter, since # is not permitted unescaped inside > identifiers.
Received on Tuesday, 21 April 2009 23:36:24 UTC