- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 20:16:30 -0700
- To: Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk>, David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
More specifically, to this part of the page: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-border-image-property On Apr 19, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > Yes. Sorry. That is where I meant. > > > On Apr 19, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Philip TAYLOR <P.Taylor@Rhul.Ac.Uk> > wrote: > >> I can find a red numbered list and the cited text here : >> >> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/ >> >> Philip TAYLOR >> -------- >> David Woolley wrote: >>> Brad Kemper wrote: >>>> >>>> On Apr 13, 2009, at 4:10 PM, fantasai wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've posted a summary of the major open issues we've been >>>>> discussing >>>>> here on css3.info: http://www.css3.info/border-image-issues/ >>>>> >>>> I had a few more thoughts about the numbered red list on that page: >>> There is no red list and I cannot find the quotes by context. >>> If there were a list that was best identified by its colour, the >>> document would have accessibility issues. >>>> • If there is a border image, the ‘border-style’ is ignored >>>> (i.e., drawn as if it were ‘none’) >>
Received on Monday, 20 April 2009 03:17:10 UTC