- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:44:35 -0700
- To: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- CC: robert@ocallahan.org, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
David Hyatt wrote: > On Apr 12, 2009, at 5:44 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote: > >> David Hyatt wrote: >>> On Apr 12, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >>>> >>>> That is not what I was asking for. >>>> >>>> Suppose I have elements A and B with intrinsic widths 100px and >>>> 200px respectively. Suppose the container has width 400px, and I >>>> want the extra space to be distributed equally to A and B, so they >>>> end up with widths 150px and 250px. Your proposal has no way to do >>>> this as far as I can tell, nor is it possible by setting min-widths >>>> or max-widths. >>>> >>>> This is actually the default behaviour for XUL boxes, so it seems >>>> important to me that any flex-box-like spec be able to do it. >>> Yeah, I just brought this up in my last message as well. The only >>> way I can see to solve this for flex units is to actually specify >>> both values, e.g., >>> width: (100px)1* >>> or something like that.... >> >> I am not sure I understand the problem. >> >> If you will define: >> >> #A { width:max-intrinsic; padding-left:1*; padding-right:1* } >> #B { width:max-intrinsic; padding-left:1*; padding-right:1* } >> >> than widths of *border* boxes will be set in the way you want. >> >> Is this the answer or I've missed something? >> > > Flexing padding won't flex the content width of the boxes, which can be > very relevant. If width is a value other than intrinsic for example. > > #A { width: 200px; box-flex: 1; } > > The object would first lay out at 200px and then it would flex to fill > the remaining space. If the box's max-intrinsic width is larger than > 200px, then flexing will enable more content to fit in the larger > available width after flexing. > How this #A { width: 200px; box-flex: 1; } is different from this: #A { min-width: 200px; width:1*; } ? Seems like XUL is using a concept of "preferred width" that I do not understand. How is that "preferred width" is related to min-width, max-width and the width in CSS? Or is it something different completely? > dave > (hyatt@apple.com) > > > -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Monday, 13 April 2009 00:45:10 UTC