- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 11:50:42 -0700
- To: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Melinda asked me to forward bits of our conversation on splitting out the properties into page-break-* and column-break-*. My main concern here is that /usually/, you want to set both page-break-* and column-break-* to the same thing. And unless this is the easier thing to do, very often it won't happen and your settings get out-of-sync. And whether you would want them different or the same, it's easy to set one and forget the other. As a result, you might get a bunch of page-breaking rules cascade in from one source and a bunch of column-breaking rules cascade in from another, clashing into something that makes no sense. An author excited about multicol sets column-break-* carefully, but their page-breaking story is still a mess because we can't leverage their interest in columns to get better printing. Etc. If we weren't very concerned about backwards compat, you could address the above concern by creating a shorthand: 1. Introduce column-break-* as parallels to page-break-*. 2. Introduce break-* as shorthands that set both page-break-* and column-break-*. You get your split out controls for all combinations, and it's easy to set both at the same time so authors are more likely to keep them in sync. But, there are disadvantages: - No way to distinguish between weighting page breaks and column breaks as equally bad vs. weighting page breaks as worse -- this is Alex's point in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Apr/0033.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Apr/0054.html - No way forward for a control to "avoid page turns, but breaks between facing pages ok" [Melinda suggests page-break-*: avoid-turn] - No meaningful resolution of contradictory settings like page-break-before: always; column-break-before: avoid; - Overhead from lots of properties that don't need to cascade independently and should always be set together anyway. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 18:51:27 UTC