- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 18:10:08 -0700
- To: Saloni Mira Rai <salonir@microsoft.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Saloni Mira Rai wrote: > Hello, > > > > Table-layout: fixed in CSS 2.1 spec is inconsistent with all current > browser behavior. > > From section 17.5.2.1 > > “If a subsequent row has more columns than the greater of the number > determined by the table-column elements and the number determined by the > first row, then additional columns must not be rendered. When using > 'table-layout: fixed', authors should not omit columns from the first row.” > > None of the browsers actually omit additional columns in tables. > > If table width is auto, all additional columns are rendered. > > If table width has a value other than auto, then additional columns are > rendered but space is distributed as needed. > > Therefore we propose changing the wording in the spec from > > “…then additional columns must not be rendered” > > To > > “…then additional columns may not be rendered” We probably need to add something saying that their width and their width's influence on the table width is undefined. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 25 September 2008 01:10:52 UTC