- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 22:41:54 -0700
- To: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
brkemper@comcast.net wrote: > >> > > Oh. You mean if a border radius is set directly on the IMG itself. > True, I misunderstood. However, that still only makes sense if > "overflow: hidden" actually hides the part of the content that is > outside of the curve of the border-radius.* And, my examples show > that it does not, except for background properties. So, testing an implementation doesn't prove what's in the spec. :) > So, I suppose I am proposing that the curve of the border-radius > DOES act as a mask of its contents, if the element with the > border-radius is set to "overflow: hidden" (or any overflow value > other than "visible"). # Backgrounds, but not the border-image, are clipped to the inner, # resp., outer curve of the border if ‘background-clip’ is # ‘padding-box’ resp., ‘border-box’. Other effects that clip to # the border or padding edge (such as ‘overflow’) also must clip # to the curve. I added that second sentence in there months ago. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 11 September 2008 05:42:40 UTC