- From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 12:55:33 +0200
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, There is some confusion internally here at Opera as to whether or not the CSS 2.1 correctly deals with the case of collapsing margins where an element has height of auto and a min-height greater than the bottom margin edge of the element's last, in-flow block-level element. The issue can be demonstrated using this test case [1]. (Firefox passes that test, but both Opera and Safari fail because they seem to collapse the bottom margin through the parent element) The confusion seems to be regarding this statement in section 8.3.1 Collapsing Margins [2]: "The bottom margin of an in-flow block-level element with a 'height' of 'auto' and 'min-height' less than the element's used height and 'max-height' greater than the element's used height is adjoining to its last in-flow block-level child's bottom margin if the element has no bottom padding or border." This doesn't seem to adequately cover the case where the min-height is greater than the bottom margin edge of the last child element, as in the test case, and it is thus unclear whether or not, per spec, the margins should collaps in that case (even though, logically, it clearly shouldn't). So the question is, is the test case correct or not? Could someone please clarify this issue? [1] http://lachy.id.au/dev/css/tests/adhoc/collapsing-margins-01.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/box.html#collapsing-margins -- Lachlan Hunt - Opera Software http://lachy.id.au/ http://www.opera.com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 September 2008 10:56:13 UTC