- From: Christoph Päper <christoph.paeper@crissov.de>
- Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 14:39:07 +0200 (CEST)
- To: www-style@w3.org
Bert Bos: > > I haven't seen a case where m or µm were needed, Micrometres weren't necessarily needed but were more comfortable to use if resolution was given as point or pixel size instead of the reciprocal dots per inch, i.e. there should have been a new unit of an existing type, not an entirely new type with two new units (one of which, 'dpcm', being very unusual).
Received on Saturday, 6 September 2008 12:39:51 UTC