- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:02:51 -0500
- To: howcome@opera.com
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 17:03:32 UTC
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote: > - text-replace: there was a debate at the F2f whether (a) this > funcionality should be offered as part of CSS, or (b) if it can be > expressed in a different way. Here is one possible solution: > > *:text("Soviet Union") { content: "Russia" } > > which, potentiall, could be even mover powerful: > > *:text("Soviet Union") { content: "Russia"; color: red } I'm not entirely sure how this is supposed to work. Is the :text pseudoclass meant to match only if the element contains *only* that text and nothing else? That seems to be the only way to square it with the operation of the content: property. It also makes it fairly useless. It would likely be more sensical to use a ::text() pseudoelement. I'm assuming that this doesn't cross element boundaries either, as I think that was the reason why a very similar proposal was dropped from an earlier draft of Selectors. This makes the operator somewhat fragile for its intended purpose. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 17:03:32 UTC