- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 12:02:51 -0500
- To: howcome@opera.com
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
- Message-ID: <dd0fbad0809031002j3fd65ed4w2d71af820664336b@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com> wrote:
> - text-replace: there was a debate at the F2f whether (a) this
> funcionality should be offered as part of CSS, or (b) if it can be
> expressed in a different way. Here is one possible solution:
>
> *:text("Soviet Union") { content: "Russia" }
>
> which, potentiall, could be even mover powerful:
>
> *:text("Soviet Union") { content: "Russia"; color: red }
I'm not entirely sure how this is supposed to work. Is the :text
pseudoclass meant to match only if the element contains *only* that text and
nothing else? That seems to be the only way to square it with the operation
of the content: property. It also makes it fairly useless. It would likely
be more sensical to use a ::text() pseudoelement.
I'm assuming that this doesn't cross element boundaries either, as I think
that was the reason why a very similar proposal was dropped from an earlier
draft of Selectors. This makes the operator somewhat fragile for its
intended purpose.
~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 17:03:32 UTC