- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:55:16 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com, www-style@w3.org
- Message-Id: <DD8818B9-AE98-40EA-8C6D-27C86ABC496A@gmail.com>
On Sep 3, 2008, at 1:39 AM, fantasai wrote: > Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com wrote: >> The usecase I had in mind was a border-collapsed table with rounded >> outer corners. Think a rounded upper-left corner like the slashdot >> stories have. >> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >> XX^^ X X >> X^ X X >> XX X X >> X First Cell X Second Cell X >> X X X >> X X X >> X X X >> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > > That's covered by the previous paragraph. This one's just talking > about internal table elements (like rows and cells). What about TBODY? The above example would also be useful on a table body. or something like this, in which the radius for the table or tbody is larger than the row height: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XX^^ | ^^XX X^ ____________|_____________^X XX | XX X | X XX _____________|____________ XX Xv | vX XXvv | vvXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > I agree with > David Baron that defining and implementing curved borders for > internal table elements is complicated and I don't think it would > be worth doing, at least not right now. If so, then I think then there should be a note that it will be tackled in a future spec, and that until that time, border radii on TRs and TDs (and TBODYs and THEADs?) must be ignored. > For the table element > itself I agree it makes sense.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 15:55:59 UTC