- From: Brad Kemper <brkemper.comcast@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2008 08:55:16 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com, www-style@w3.org
- Message-Id: <DD8818B9-AE98-40EA-8C6D-27C86ABC496A@gmail.com>
On Sep 3, 2008, at 1:39 AM, fantasai wrote:
> Nick_Hofstede@inventivegroup.com wrote:
>> The usecase I had in mind was a border-collapsed table with rounded
>> outer corners. Think a rounded upper-left corner like the slashdot
>> stories have.
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>> XX^^ X X
>> X^ X X
>> XX X X
>> X First Cell X Second Cell X
>> X X X
>> X X X
>> X X X
>> XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
>
> That's covered by the previous paragraph. This one's just talking
> about internal table elements (like rows and cells).
What about TBODY? The above example would also be useful on a table
body. or something like this, in which the radius for the table or
tbody is larger than the row height:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX^^ | ^^XX
X^ ____________|_____________^X
XX | XX
X | X
XX _____________|____________ XX
Xv | vX
XXvv | vvXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
> I agree with
> David Baron that defining and implementing curved borders for
> internal table elements is complicated and I don't think it would
> be worth doing, at least not right now.
If so, then I think then there should be a note that it will be
tackled in a future spec, and that until that time, border radii on
TRs and TDs (and TBODYs and THEADs?) must be ignored.
> For the table element
> itself I agree it makes sense.
Received on Wednesday, 3 September 2008 15:55:59 UTC