- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 18:04:26 -0700
- To: Peter Moulder <Peter.Moulder@infotech.monash.edu.au>, www-style@w3.org
L. David Baron wrote: > On Tuesday 2008-05-13 15:15 +1000, Peter Moulder wrote: >> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 05:04:09PM -0700, L. David Baron wrote: >> >>> This has been recorded as >>> http://csswg.inkedblade.net/spec/css3-color#issue-19 and has been >>> addressed in the editor's draft at >>> http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-color/#svg-color by adding the >>> sentence: >>> # This specification extends their definition beyond SVG. >> Can sections 4.1 and 4.3 be merged, then? Suggested title ‘Color >> keywords’. We could still start by listing the 16 HTML colours (or 17 >> CSS 2.1 colours, = HTML + orange) given that they include the most basic >> colours. >> >> Having a single section makes it clearer that there's no distinction in >> their treatment as far as css3-color is concerned. > > Reorganizing the specification at this level of maturity has a bit > of cost (breaking links people have, requiring reorganization of the > test suite, etc.). It also makes it a lot harder to write the > profiles section I reference below. Do you really think that's > worth it? You could just rename the sections "Basic Color Keywords" and "Extended Color Keywords" and leave the anchors intact. ~fantasai
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2008 01:05:20 UTC