- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:21:00 -0400
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Justin Rogers <justrog@microsoft.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Justin Rogers wrote: >> So the question is, should the grammar in this case be read strictly >> since it clearly points out a semantic for the @media block, and thus >> only allow rule-sets making the Opera/IE 8 behavior correct? Or should >> the parsers allow any statement within the block including the at-rule? > > CSS Level 3 allows using e.g. @page as child of @media, so you will end > up implementing the latter behavior either way. I think the real question is what CSS2.1 should say, or CSS3 should say for UAs that don't support @page to make @page usable inside @media... Sounds like the Gecko behavior is what will be needed to make the rule following the @page not disappear in UAs not supporting @page. -Boris
Received on Wednesday, 25 June 2008 04:21:47 UTC