- From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 12:04:23 +0200
- To: "Stewart Brodie" <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>, www-style@w3.org
On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:49:44 +0200, Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: > On reflection, I chose a bad example as I was mixing up two issues: the > first being that the wording is a little opaque in the penultimate > sentence; > the second being the meaning of (min-width). Sorry for that. > > When the specification says "Media features that are min/max prefixed are > treated in an identical way", what does that actually mean - identical to > what? The feature without the min/max prefix? Is it saying that both > "(min-width)" and "(max-width)" are identical to just "(width)"? That you should treat (min-width) equivalently to (width). It says that because min-width is not actually a media feature, it's just a prefixed form of the media feature width. (I don't believe this distinction has any advantage though.) -- Anne van Kesteren <http://annevankesteren.nl/> <http://www.opera.com/>
Received on Tuesday, 10 June 2008 10:05:33 UTC