- From: Alex Mogilevsky <alexmog@exchange.microsoft.com>
- Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 14:28:21 -0700
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
I agree, it would be reasonable to add a clarification like this. There is a good level of interop now, at least at the level of inline vs. block so it will help to have a little less guessing. -----Original Message----- From: fantasai [mailto:fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net] Sent: Monday, June 09, 2008 1:39 PM To: Alex Mogilevsky Cc: Anton Prowse; www-style@w3.org Subject: Re: [CSS 2.1] static position of an absolutely positioned element with auto-offsets ... Alex, do we need to make a clarification here to avoid the IE<8 interpretation? I would have expected that the "if its 'position' property had been 'static'" bit would require guessing the position using the specified (not used) display property. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 21:29:04 UTC