- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 13:28:59 -0700
- To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
- CC: Stewart Brodie <stewart.brodie@antplc.com>, www-style@w3.org, "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
Anne van Kesteren wrote: > > On Mon, 09 Jun 2008 16:15:12 +0200, fantasai > <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: >> Anne van Kesteren wrote: >>> On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 18:54:29 +0200, Stewart Brodie >>> <stewart.brodie@antplc.com> wrote: >>>> Re: Editor's Draft, 5 June, http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-mediaqueries/ >>>> >>>> Is it intended that non-integral numbers are permitted in <resolution> >>>> values? >>> >>> It didn't seem worth it introducing an integer type in the grammar >>> just for <resolution>. >> >> So does that mean non-integer values are allowed? > > Hmm, given that there's an <integer> production in CSS 2.1 which seems > to only [-+][0-9]* I guess it's better to limit the resolution features > to integers and leave the grammar as is. > > Would it suffice to add a line to section 5.1 that says "These units > must be preceded by an integer."? Depends on how you want error handling to work. I assume you want 100dpi to be valid and 100.5dpi to be invalid. What about 100.0dpi? I'd try to get David Baron's opinion on that one. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 June 2008 20:29:52 UTC