- From: Francois Remy <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:20:23 +0200
- To: "Brad Kemper" <brkemper@comcast.net>, "Andrew Fedoniouk" <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Cc: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
From: "Brad Kemper" <brkemper@comcast.net>
>
>
> On Jul 24, 2008, at 10:01 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk wrote:
>
>> Second:
>>
>> Consider these two selectors:
>>
>> p
>> {
>> border: none;
>> }
>>
>> html:with-child(a:hover) p
>> {
>> border: 2em;
>> }
>>
>> and markup:
>>
>> <html>
>> <p><a href="*">sample</a></p>
>> </html>
>
> As far as I can tell, nothing would happen there, because the HTML
> element does not have an anchor ("A" element) as a child. It only has
> one as a descendant, and I thought "with-child" referred to immediate
> children only, not grandchildren.
No with-child refers to grandchildren too.
But it's possible that the name is bad choosen.
Fremy
Received on Friday, 25 July 2008 15:34:23 UTC