- From: Francois Remy <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:28:38 +0200
- To: "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com>, "Brad Kemper" <brkemper@comcast.net>
- Cc: <w3mail@jixor.com>, <www-style@w3.org>
In fact, it's not very complicated to find the matching elements. << before-selector selector:with-child(child-selector) after-selector { property: value; } >> << var matchingEls = concat( from el in document.querySelectorAll('before-selector selector') where el.querySelector('child-selector') isnot null select el.querySelectorAll('after-selector') ); >> I don't see where we must apply two time the same selector... In fact, we only apply three selectors : - A first selector to match all possibly matched elements - A second selector that we apply only while no matching element is found. - A last selector, that's called only if a element matched the second selector. If no element matched the second one, the last one is not executed. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Alan Gresley" <alan@css-class.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 5:05 PM To: "Brad Kemper" <brkemper@comcast.net> Cc: <w3mail@jixor.com>; <www-style@w3.org> Subject: Re: Parent Combinator / Parent pseudo-class > > Brad Kemper wrote: > [...] >>> A parent combinator pseudo-class or parent pseudo-class requires a CSS >>> parser to walk the chain. >> >> Only of immediate children, not of all descendants of a particular >> has-child selector. Anyone using it more than sparingly should expect >> some performance degradation. > > > But what Stephen is`suggesting is firstly to walk the chain backwards to > the parent element and then secondly match each particular parent child > combinator. If my understanding is correct, that is a double performances > hit. > > > -- > Alan http://css-class.com/ > > Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's > character, give him power - Abraham Lincoln >
Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 15:29:19 UTC