- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 15:39:16 +1200
- To: "Bert Bos" <bert@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 21 July 2008 03:39:54 UTC
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: > On Saturday 12 July 2008 01:08, Doug Schepers wrote: > > Personally, I see this as a high priority. I think it should be > > started in a timeframe that allows Mozilla, Opera, and Safari to > > include this in upcoming product releases. > > I disagree. For me this is low priority. > > SVG exists. People can already make a fancy filter or gradient. But they can't apply them to CSS-formatted elements. If after all that we still think that CSS isn't big enough, we can discuss > copying some features from SVG to CSS. > The proposal doesn't do that. In fact, it is motivated by a strong desire to avoid copying features from one spec to another. Is there some confusion here? Perhaps you should re-read the proposal? http://people.mozilla.com/~roc/SVG-CSS-Effects-Draft.html Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Monday, 21 July 2008 03:39:54 UTC