- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 12:23:33 -0700
- To: Marshal Horn <kamocat@gmail.com>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Marshal Horn wrote: > A VERY powerful addition to CSS3 (that doesn't conflict with the current method) > The ability to specify the opacity of an item individually to each of > its ancestor tags. Say you have a list item inside an untitled list, > nested in a div tag (which is the direct descendant of the body). > Assume they all have content or solid backgrounds. > ... > I believe it best to add the transparencies, because it allows for the > most flexibility and control. However, there is an additional value > called "auto" to allow an opacity to that layer to be overridden if it > is specified elsewhere (of course, default is 1.0) > Now there's three options if an object tries to lend more than its full opacity: I'm having trouble understanding your request. Can you draw a picture of the effect you are trying to achieve and explain how it cannot be done with 'opacity' as it works today? > This would be an addition to CSS3 Color Module section 3.2 > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-iccprof#transparency Hm. A more up-to-date URL would be http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-color/#transparency The CSS3 Color module is very close to done. It's too late to add anything there. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 17 July 2008 19:24:11 UTC