- From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 17:51:47 +1200
- To: "Robin Berjon" <robin@berjon.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2008 05:52:25 UTC
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 2:32 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 9:46 AM, Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com> wrote: > >> I can't say that I have a strong opinion on this, but I believe it clashes >> with this: http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/linking.html#LinksIntoSVG >> > Thinking about it more, arguably that section is inconsistent in spirit with the preexisting usage of fragment references in SVG 1.1 to identify paint servers, filters, clip-paths, masks, <use> and <feImage> [1]; in all those cases, the rendering of the referenced subtree is not affected by effects defined on ancestors. It's a bit disappointing to see that change now. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/filters.html#feImage Rob -- "He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah 53:5-6]
Received on Tuesday, 15 July 2008 05:52:25 UTC