- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:08:11 -0400
- To: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Hi, Folks- Bert Bos wrote (on 7/11/08 2:58 PM): > On Wednesday 09 July 2008 01:00, Robert O'Callahan wrote: >> >> I'd greatly appreciate any comments. One thing I'm not sure about is >> where this specification should live. Obviously it's right in between >> two working groups :-). > > Specifications that involve two or more working groups (other than just > to review each other's work) are indeed always a bit problematic. But > as Robin already said, there is nothing that prohibits them. It is just > a question of organization. Depending on the nature of the work, it > could be handled by joint meetings, by a task force, by people who > attend both groups, or, if the project is simple enough, by letting one > group do the writing and the other the reviews. From a logistical point of view, the obvious time and place to continue this discussion is at the TPAC in October. And, of course, on this thread, in the meantime. > A different problem is how to set the priorities. Compared to all the > other work being done in SVG and CSS, how high a priority is this and > how many resources are available for it? Should it be done in the next > two years (at the cost of what other work?), can it wait a year or two, > should it not be done anytime soon, or not be done at all... Personally, I see this as a high priority. I think it should be started in a timeframe that allows Mozilla, Opera, and Safari to include this in upcoming product releases. CDF WG might be a good place for this to be specified, or we could form a new joint Task Force. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, WebApps, SVG, and CDF
Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 23:08:54 UTC