- From: David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:14:33 -0500
- To: robert@ocallahan.org
- Cc: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 22:17:58 UTC
On Jul 11, 2008, at 5:04 PM, Robert O'Callahan wrote: > On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:55 AM, David Hyatt <hyatt@apple.com> wrote: > > They don't? Are you saying that you ignore clip/opacity if set on > an ancestor of the element used as a paint server? > > As per SVG, SVG paint servers are not affected by effects on > ancestors. > > If you're talking about the element-as-background extension, I > haven't written down a proposed spec for that yet. But when I do, it > will also ignore clip, opacity and other effects on the ancestors of > referenced elements. Is that surprising? I can't think why you'd > want it any other way. I believe it might be surprising if you intended to use the feature to do say reflections or thumbnails. dave
Received on Friday, 11 July 2008 22:17:58 UTC